One was an avid capitalist, an actor-turned-U.S. president determined to quash America鈥檚 nuclear arms race with the Soviet Union鈥檚 鈥渆vil empire.鈥 The other, a young committed communist who rose through the political ranks to lead the USSR, pushing publicly for reform.
But Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev, unusual bedfellows as they may have been, managed to forge not only a mutual respect, but a friendship, which helped end the Cold War.
鈥淚 think, frankly, (that) President Gorbachev and I discovered a sort of a bond, a friendship between us, that we thought could become such a bond between all the people,鈥 Reagan in Moscow during a visit in 1990.
But moving from 鈥渆vil鈥 to 鈥渇riendship鈥 wasn鈥檛 automatic. Reagan was initially wary of the kind of leader Gorbachev would be.
Reagan and Gorbachev Both Sought Change
鈥淚n Reagan's view, Gorbachev was a communist, and could be expected to act like a communist,鈥 says H.W. Brands, author of and history professor at the University of Texas at Austin. 鈥淕radually, Reagan realized Gorbachev was also a man, not that different from himself鈥攁 national leader who wanted the best for his people, and to avoid a nuclear war.鈥
In his book, 鈥 Reagan/Gorbachev and the Correspondences that Ended the Cold War, historian Jason Saltoun-Ebin writes that confidential letters between the two world leaders forced the men to 鈥渢alk, debate, argue, disagree, but also offer proposals even when they thought no agreement would be possible.鈥
鈥淏oth Reagan and Gorbachev recognized that change was coming, and both wanted to be on the right side of history,鈥 he writes. 鈥淏ut they needed to find a way to overcome forty years of Cold War ideology. They needed to find a way to trust each other.鈥
More than 40 letters, many hand-written, and four summits in just over three years were key to building that trust. In his autobiography, , Reagan writes: 鈥淎s I look back on them now, I realize those first letters marked the cautious beginning on both sides of what was to become the foundation of not only a better relationship between our countries but a friendship between two men.鈥
鈥淭heir meetings were critical,鈥 says Melvyn P. Leffler, a professor of history emeritus specializing in U.S. foreign relations at the University of Virginia. 鈥淓ach came to appreciate the genuine security fears of the other.鈥
And Cold War fears were cause for great alarm. During his presidency, Reagan was often quoted as saying, 鈥淲e don鈥檛 mistrust each other because we鈥檙e armed; we鈥檙e armed because we mistrust each other.鈥
鈥淩eagan wanted arms control, but he wanted to make sure it didn't compromise American security,鈥 Brands says. 鈥淗e began cautiously with Gorbachev, but he wanted to get past mistrust to the point where each side had some confidence in the good intentions of the other. Even then, he insisted, 鈥楾rust, but verify.鈥"
Reagan Retires 'Evil Empire' Label
Timing also came into play. Gorbachev鈥檚 rise to leader of the Soviet Union on March 11, 1985, followed a string of USSR ruler deaths, when Leonid Brezhnev died in 1982, Yuri Andropov died in 1984 and Konstantin Chernenko died in 1985. But Leffler says Gorbachev was different from his predecessors.
鈥淗e deeply desired to reform the Soviet system and improve living standards,鈥 he says. 鈥淗e recognized that ratcheting down military expenditures and modulating the Cold War were necessary preconditions for achieving his domestic priorities.鈥
Brands adds that the common ground Reagan found with Gorbachev wouldn鈥檛 have been possible with Russia鈥檚 previous leaders.
鈥淚f Brezhnev had lived another six years, Reagan would have made no progress on arms control,鈥 he says. 鈥淩eagan needed someone to meet him halfway. He found this person in Gorbachev.鈥
In his book, , William Taubman writes that during Reagan鈥檚 Moscow visit in 1988, a reporter asked the president at the Kremlin whether he still considered Russia the 鈥渆vil empire.鈥
鈥淣o,鈥 Reagan replied. 鈥淭hat was another time, another era.鈥 Another reporter asked whether the two were now old friends. 鈥淒a! Da!鈥 Gorbachev said, with Reagan adding, 鈥淵es.鈥
鈥淧erhaps then the real story of the end of the Cold War is just a simple tale of how an old hard-line anti-Communist president of the United States and a young Soviet reformer discovered that, despite their vast differences, all they needed to do was find one common area of agreement to change the world,鈥 Saltoun-Ebin writes. 鈥淭he elimination of nuclear weapons became their focus.鈥